Tag Archives: Delaware Riverkeeper Network

Uphold Pennsylvania’s Environmental Rights Amendment & Act on Climate!

email from Delaware Riverkeeper Network, 12/13/18

Pennsylvania’s constitution contains an environmental rights amendment, or a Green Amendment—Article 1, Section 27—protecting every Pennsylvanian’s right to pure water, clean air and a healthy environment for both present and future generations.

Since its adoption in 1971, legislators and governors have largely ignored it. In 2013, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, and her team won a watershed legal victory that breathed legal life into the constitutional right of people in the state to a clean and healthy environment. But the battle to fully define and defend the environmental rights of the People of Pennsylvania continues.

It’s time for Pennsylvanians to claim that right.

The Delaware Riverkeeper Network, along with the Better Path Coalition, invite you to join our campaign to tell Harrisburg that it’s time to uphold Article 1, Section 27 and be the climate and environmental champions we need.

Here’s how you can get involved!

Sign and share the online version of our petition right now!
Circulate a paper petition in your community!
Plan to join us in Harrisburg on January 27th (1/27) to learn more about our Pennsylvania Green Amendment and to be part of our call to the legislators that it is time to honor their oath to defend our constitutional right to pure water, clean air and a healthy environment.

Documentary on PA Environmental Rights Amendment features the Delaware Riverkeeper

News from Delaware Riverkeeper Network, a member of the Chester County Environment Alliance:

Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, was featured on the State Impact Pennsylvania documentary “Generations Yet To Come: The story of environmental rights in Pennsylvania,” which focuses on Article 1 Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, known as Pennsylvania’s Green Amendment. Van Rossum and her team were instrumental in the 2013 legal victory Robinson Township v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that breathed life back into the amendment.

Van Rossum was the featured speaker at the Sept. 8, 2018, Chester County March for Climate Justice and Environment.

Read more in “DRN & 7 Towns Challenge & Defeat Act 13.” Excerpt:

…”The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision on December 19, 2013. In that decision the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that Act 13 violates the Pennsylvania Constitution on the grounds that it violates the Environmental Rights Amendment. In doing so, the Court held that the right to pure water, clean air and a healthy environment are fundamental rights that must be given high-priority consideration and protection by every level of Pennsylvania’s government. The Court’s decision also struck down the shale gas industry’s effort to force every municipality in the state to allow gas drilling and related industrial operations in every zoning district. The Court’s decision upheld the ability of local governments to protect their local communities and natural resources through zoning….”

Watch the 26-minute documentary here, including also Franklin Kury [photo Kury speaking in the video], who as a young legislator secured passage of the state’s 1971 “Green Amendment,” which reads:

“The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania’s public natural resources are the common property of all the people, including generations yet to come. As trustee of these resources, the Commonwealth shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all the people.”

But as the documentary brings out, municipalities still need to zone properly to keep threats to residents’ welfare out of residential districts. And some interviewees still uphold the industry point of view that the courts should defer to the legislature, which of course is heavily influenced by industry donations, and that “property rights” confer a right to pollute and degrade the environment. Constant vigilance is still needed!

Compare to pipeline operators’ current attempts to place pipelines wherever suits them?

Lawsuit denied concerning Bishop Tube site

Daily Local News, Sep 7, 2018

EAST WHITELAND – The Pennsylvania Superior Court dismissed the continued attempt by Bishop Tube Developer Brian O’Neill, along with his corporate counterparts O’Neill Developers and Constitution Drive Partners, to silence the Delaware Riverkeeper Network.

The Riverkeeper has fought to build a park at the brownfield site.

The Sept. 6 dismissal was rendered by Judge Bender and Judge Lazarus of the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

“The lawsuit filed by Brian O’Neill and his counterparts was a clear effort to silence, through intimidation, myself, my organization and the residents opposed to his proposed partial clean up and associated development plan; this is what is known as a SLAPP suit, a strategic lawsuit against public participation,” said Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper. “It is wrong for anyone, particularly a well-funded team of lawyers, corporations and individuals to misuse our legal system to scare a community into silence.

“While we were confident that the judges would once again see through Mr. O’Neill’s false claims, bluster and fear tactics, it’s always nice when the decision finally comes down. If Mr. O’Neill appeals yet again, we will know that this is a clear and obvious strategy to try to drain the financial resources of a concerned nonprofit and private individuals.”

The site is bordered by Little Valley Creek, a tributary to the “exceptional value” Valley Creek. Portions of the site proposed for development are wooded. The site is listed on the Pennsylvania Priority List of Hazardous Sites for Remedial Response under the Pennsylvania Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act (HSCA). Groundwater, soil and surface water at the Site are contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE), which is classified as a probable human carcinogen by the EPA and also as causing other significant health problems. Other contaminants of significant concern are also known to be present at the site.

The Delaware Riverkeeper Network, led by van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, was also named as a defendant in the suit, and has been actively challenging a proposal by O’Neill, O’Neill Developers and Constitution Drive Partners for only a partial clean-up of the contaminated site known as Bishop Tube located in East Whiteland Township. O’Neill wants to build more than 200 homes at the site.

The original SLAPP action was filed by O’Neill on June 27, 2017 in the Court of Common Pleas in Chester County and claimed the advocacy activities of van Rossum and the Delaware Riverkeeper Network resulted in defamation/commercial disparagement, interference with contractual or business relations and amounted to a civil conspiracy.

O’Neill sought a judgement that would both silence the organization and mandate they pay over $50,000 in damages. The suit also threatened to target up to 10 additional residents, naming them as defendants to the suit, in addition to a resident already included as a named defendant.

Judge J. Sommers, presiding over the case at the Court of Common Pleas, dismissed the suit on Aug. 22, 2017, determining that van Rossum and the Delaware Riverkeeper Network were engaged in “constitutionally protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and the Pennsylvania Constitution” and that the defendants are “immune from plaintiff’s tort claims.”

O’Neill and his counterparts immediately appealed the decision. Judge Sommers issued a follow-up opinion in which the judge stated that the complaints filed against DRN “lack merit.”…

read more at Daily Local News. See also Bishop Tube – Clean, Green Open Space, Not Partial Cleanup for Buildout on Facebook